//G-Sync vs. FreeSync: What display technology reigns supreme?

G-Sync vs. FreeSync: What display technology reigns supreme?

G-Sync vs. FreeSync. Nvidia vs AMD. A battle that seems to have unfolded since the beginning of time, but which, in reality, only lasts since Amd bought ATI in 2006. Before that date, Nvidia was arguing with ATI on which the cards second graphics than the other, but it was good before one or the other company did not even know what was the problem of "tearing the screen", and still less how to solve it.

Nowadays, people are wondering what is the best solution. problem: Nvidia G-Sync or FreeSync from AMD? Well, grab some popcorn and get settled, as we break down the few differences and the most common similarities between the two competing technologies and what makes them work.

The Plague of Screen Rips

 G-Sync vs. FreeSync "width =" 900 "height =" 505 "class =" alignnone size-full "wp- image-233096 "/> </p>
<p> and what is the cause, you must first know how a graphics card and a monitor communicate with each other. </p>
<p> When a graphics card tells an monitor what it should display, it sends images to the screen. The refresh rate determines the number of times that a monitor will request a new frame of information for your graphics card and, depending on the power of that card, how fast it will display it. </p>
<p> For most standard monitors (and 4K monitors), this occurs at 60 Hz or 60 frames per second. second, when high-performance gaming monitors can reach 144 Hz, or 144 frames per second. </p>
<h2> What is tearing screens? </h2>
<p> to push an extra frame to the screen before it is ready. Although the process is a little more complex, things work in the simplest way. </p>
<p> This problem has been solved for years on the software side, with a parameter called "Vsync". This is an option that you can activate in any game that locks the frame output to the expected refresh rate of the monitor, usually at 60 Hz. It's fine if you have a graphics card capable of producing comfortably and regularly at least 60 frames per second, but if this is not the case, Vsync will throw numbers to the wall (from 45 to 10 frames per second), which can significantly affect the performance of lower level systems. </p>
<p> So, what does this have to do with <a href= G-Sync vs. FreeSync? Read on to find out more.

VESA Adaptive Synchronization

 Sync-G vs. FreeSync "width =" 900 "height =" 505 "class =" full-aligned-size wp-image-233097 "/> </p>
<p> On the one hand, the AMD FreeSync solution takes advantage of an acquired rights technology that works in all current iterations of DisplayPort 1.2a cables, called "adaptive synchronization" </p>
<p> Adaptive Synchronization is the first hardware-based solution to tear the screen, an open source technology that AMD uses to maintain a consistent layer of frames and refresh "synchronized" displays. Adaptive synchronization being open source, it is ridiculous – inexpensive to implement in monitors or graphics cards, making AMD the best option for low-budget gamers. </p>
<p> Nvidia uses its own own proprietary version of the adaptive synchronization technology called "G-Sync". as a chip that is in the monitor itself, designed to communicate directly with other Nvidia-based graphics cards. These two solutions do the same thing by creating two separate hardware elements inside the monitor and graphics card designed to combat screen tearing, but which one is best? </p>
<h2> G-Sync and FreeSync: Who's the best? </h2>
<p> <img src= best gaming monitors and best computer monitors .

Then, many commentators and players report that FreeSync configurations can solve the screen tear, but suffer from another problem known as "ghosting". Ghost images occur when an object on the screen briefly leaves an artifact of the last image displayed before the next, giving the characters a sort of "ghost" like a trail that can worsen at as other actions accumulate on the screen.

] Finally, for the moment, Nvidia is the only company to offer adaptive synchronization technology (G-Sync) on the best gaming notebook . AMD has not made any announcements about importing its FreeSync technology into the mobile gaming world, so for the moment, it's a market where Nvidia feels like it's not to leave soon.

Final Verdict

That it is AMD vs. Intel or Nvidia vs. Intel, G-Sync vs. FreeSync; as always, the cost is low.

As with almost all AMD products, monitors and cards with FreeSync compatibility are cheaper than their Nvidia counterparts when combined. That said, Nvidia's G-Sync is unquestionably superior technology and does not present as many image or performance issues as AMD users report on their FreeSync setups.

If you can easily afford an Nvidia G-Sync configuration and want the absolute peak of performance, this will be the choice for you. If you are shopping on a limited budget and do not mind a little delay or slight image issues, an AMD FreeSync installation should work fine.

And of course, no matter which configuration you ultimately decide to follow, everyone can agree that both are clearly better than being stuck with the old Vsync for your next high gaming session in colors.

G-Sync vs. FreeSync: What Supreme Display Technologies?

2,3 (46.67%) 3 votes
Acer Predator Game Monitor XB271HK 4K 27 " Best Monitor of game 144Hz